Sons of Liberty - New Jersey
Sons of Liberty Broadside, December 17, 1765
Massachusetts Historical Society
Welcome to the Sons of Liberty webpage.  I decided after the debacle of the last general election in 2012 to put up this webpage in order to have a voice.  Like many of you I have felt completely helpless against what unfortunately has happened - the second term election of Barack Hussein Obama, and what I believe to be the consequences of this election

The purpose of this webpage is myriad.  One of the most important reasons is for me to be able to write about what is going on in our country and to speak with likeminded Americans who want to be heard and also to know the comfort that there are people out there who think similar to you.  My first article for this page is "Thoughts on the Presidential Election of 2012."  I wrote this piece in November 2012 right after the election and as you will read, I have serious concerns about our future.  In the comings days, I'll write on political issues as well as morality issues, since they are truly linked.

President George Washingon said in his 1796 Farewell address:  "Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.It is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who, that is a sincere friend to it, can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric?"

So here, forthwith, is my commentary in the blog to the right.  Let me know what you think.  

Gerri Gibney


“Timid, Toothless Tiger” Better Known as President Barack Hussein Obama”

by Gerri Gibney on 09/01/13

I’m not going to dwell on Barack Hussein Obama or as I like to call him the “Timid, Toothless Tiger” and his recent pass-off of responsibility to the congress, but rather the consequences of TTT’s lack of action in Syria.  We could argue the Constitutional question as to whether he should go to the Congress, and I believe the Constitution dictates that he should go to them to declare an act of war.  Where was TTT two years ago when the gassing first started?  He drew his “red line” about eight months ago and Assad crossed it.  He did not go to the people’s representatives until after his saber rattling wasn’t going very well with the rest of the world and the people of America, so he decided to go to congress to spread the wealth around.


In typical TTT fashion, if it goes well, he’ll take the credit, and if it goes bad, why he’ll blame congress, especially George Bush’s RHINO crowd.  Why didn’t he go to the congress in the first place?  David Axelrod, a longtime Obama advisor, tweeted after TTT’s speech; “Congress is now the dog that caught the car.”  This thinking is now our foreign policy.


Evidently, genocide is O.K. when it fits into TTT’s schedule.  Before his punt to congress it seemed as if John Kerry was advocating immediate response.  TTT came out after Kerry’s speech and told of “consequences.”  I guess the “consequences” can wait until after the Russian summit and after the congress comes back into session, and, of course, after TTT’s golf game.


We now know his foreign policy as to Syria, do nothing, until Assad does something and then there will be “consequences,” perhaps bombing of some headquarters or bomb site, after everything has been removed and there is only some poor sole left to guard the bomb site facility. 


What about the rest of the bad guys out there?  Barack Hussein Obama said in his latest remarks about Syria “Right makes might, not the other way around.”  Really?  What “right” does TTT have on his side?  What moral compass does he subscribe to?  This outrage against innocent people was an outrage, but after a few days is it any less so?  How long will it take congress to make a decision.    


The Old Testament shows us God is just.  I believe this and it will be so in this latest human outrage as well.  Our leadership is not acting as a moral and just government, but as a political action committee.  TTT has no moral code; noble, just, upright are not what defines him, rather self-serving, unjust, expedient lack of principle do.


This is what leading from behind does to a nation; it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.  We no longer lead; we react to the despots of the world.  If TTT really meant that America would not tolerate this inhumanity and that it was a direct threat to America, he should have acted on his belief and his stated policy.  Unfortunately, he has no policy, and his belief is not the best interest of America, rather it is the best interest of his Black Liberation, and Marxist ideology.


Iran is continuing on its way to the development of nuclear weaponry, Korea goes about killing innocent people, and why not?  The Timid, Toothless Tiger doesn’t know what to do so he goes to congress.


President George Washington and President Dwight Eisenhower did not believe in bringing the United States into other nations’ conflicts unless it directly affected our national interests.  They did, however, believe in America and our system, and they did have operatives everywhere to make sure that our interests would always be first for our people.  What does president Barack Hussein Obama have in place – a bunch of community organizers who hate America?


Gerri Gibney

September 1, 2013





by Gerri Gibney on 08/27/13



The 50th anniversary of Dr. Martin King’s “March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom” and his “I Have a Dream,” speech just passed and there was much publicity as it should have been.  In this speech Dr. King remarked about his four little children saying; “…one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”


This powerful speech, almost a sermon, listed the ideals and promises of America, and the irrefutable fact that:  “It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked "insufficient funds." But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check — a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.”


He uses the word “check” but he is not speaking of money, Dr. King talks of the “great vaults of opportunity,” and the “riches of freedom and the security of justice.”  He tells everyone this is what has been promised through the law of the United States, this is the reality of the day, and this is what can be.  He even admonishes; “But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.”


He clearly states do not be bitter, do not hate, do not be guilty of wrongful deeds. 


At the time some of the more radical leaders who were on the march condemned the speech, saying it was too compromising.  Malcolm X in his autobiography said:  “Whoever heard of angry revolutionaries swinging their bare feet together with their oppressor in lily pad pools, with gospels and guitars and ‘I have a dream’ speeches?”


Malcolm X’s comment seems more in tune with the President Barack Hussein Obama, fifty years later, than with the noble, inspiring, truth-filled words of Dr. King.


Fifty years after this speech we have a black President, would Dr. King be happy with this president?   The opportunity Dr. King spoke of is a reality, no matter what black racists try to tell us.  The black man is judged by his character, not his skin color. The black President Barack Hussein Obama does not believe this is so, he is living in the world Dr. King presented to us so eloquently 50 years ago, not today’s world.


A case in point; back in 2009 when the Harvard professor, Gates was arrested over an incident at his home, the president was asked in a news conference; What does it say about race relations in America?" Obama replied, "Now, I've – I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home. And number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there is a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That's just a fact."


The words of President Barack Hussein Obama are divisive and racist.  The president did not know the facts (his own words), and yet he knew the police had acted stupidly, and that the incident was racially motivated.  How did he “know” these things?  Because he is still in the 1960’s, and is trying his best by his words to bring the rest of the country with him in his hatred. 


Barack Hussein Obama is filled with loathing of this country (he certainly apologizes for us enough), he believes in class warfare (wealth redistribution), and he believes there is no justice in America.  After all, look at his remarks about the Trevon Martin case.  In Obama’s five years in office, he has done more to set back race relations than any person or group.


The racism that is being spoken of right now is a direct result of President Barack Hussein Obama’s lack of leadership and his complete lack of understanding of America.  He lives in the very world that Dr. King warned about 50 years ago.  “Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.”


Shame on Obama, shame on him! 


Is this the America Dr. King dreamed of; where the President of the United States defines people as to the color of their skin, not the content of their character?  Where the President sees only race and not the facts?  Where the President talks down America instead of lifting it up?


I really wonder if Barack Hussein Obama has read Dr. King’s speech, and if Dr. King were alive today would he be willing to give up all the strides that he helped to put into place by going along with Obama and his racism?  I’ll answer the question; I would like to believe that Dr. King meant what he said and would be an honorable upright man, and not a pandering sycophant simply to satisfy a Communist street organizer.


Gerri Gibney

August 27, 2013

























"You Get What You Asked For"

by Gerri Gibney on 08/23/13

“You Get What You Asked For”


The other day I was asked “are you still writing your blog?”  And, last night I got the same question.  The “guilts” started to take over, but not too much, since after all it is summer.  But, after reading about a recently passed bill in the District of Columbia in July, I realized it’s time to get back to business.


The bill I am referring to is called “Large Retailer Accountability Act of 2013” which requires big retailers such as Wal-Mart to pay starting wages that would be 50% higher than the District’s minimum wage, and to provide health care.  Yes, you read the last sentence correctly.  There is now a law in DC that tells a private corporation how much they must pay their employees. 


I decided to read the law myself, just to make sure I was getting the correct information, and it is true.  Here’s a short recap of the bill; (1) The Council of DC’s policy is to promote living wage jobs, (2) Some large retailers pay low wages and don’t provide health care.  By adopting living wage standards, the District can ensure that economic development better meets the community’s need for family-supporting jobs.  (3) Responsible retailers face growing pressure to cut back when their competitors are permitted to pay low wages and no benefits.  Result could be increased costs to the District when businesses that provide health care are replaced by those who do not and instead rely on city health clinics, public hospitals, and publicly funded programs such as Medicaid.  (4) It is appropriate to set a standard for larger businesses in the retail industry because (A) large retailers are better able to afford the cost of paying a living wage than many other kind of employees (B) a number of large retailers in the region are already paying a living wage, evidence that it is feasible for employers in this industry to create good jobs while still operating profitability (C) large retailers generally are less likely than other kinds of businesses to respond to such regulation by closing or reducing employment because the retail industry is more location-dependent, and (D) in other cities, the enactment of living wage laws has had no negative impact on retail employment and development.  (5) In order to safeguard the public health, safety, welfare and prosperity of all Washingtonians, the District must establish a code of conduct for responsible retailers in our community ensuring that large retailers pay their workers a living wage and provide affordable health benefits.


As I am typing this law, I can feel my heart pounding and my total frustration and anger rising.  Is it possible that such a bill could be put forward in the United States of America?  Do any of the eight people (8-to-5 vote) who voted to pass this bill have any concept about economics, free enterprise, capitalism, or liberty?  Do they know anything about our system of government?  I know the answer to my question; they don’t.


I looked at other cities that have passed various “living wage laws,” there are about 125 municipalities, including Hudson County and Jersey City, New Jersey in this mix.  You won’t be surprised to learn that many of the cities that have such laws are in the State of California.  As a matter of fact, San Francisco was named and touted by the DC Council as one of the successful cities who had a living wage law on the books.  San Francisco’s law includes a proviso for health care, and if the employer does not pay health care they are required to pay $1.25 per hour into the city’s public health care system!  We all know where California is headed, and is there any wonder why?


By the way, since November 1998 the City of Detroit, that shining example of good, decent, prosperous government has had such a law on their books.


Going back to the DC Bill, look at number 4 (C) which speaks of large retailers less likely to close or reduce their work force since they are “location-dependent.”  Just love that phrase “location-dependent,” since it reminds me of another phrase that I have used many times; “don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.”  If this is what the District of Columbia wants, so be it.  And, please, gently close the door.


Wal-Mart has announced it will not build another three proposed stores in the District, and if they have any sense they will close the existing ones.  How many jobs will that mean to the District?  After all, “You Get What You Asked For.”


Gerri Gibney

August 23, 2013


“Barack Hussein Obama Calls Christianity into Question - Religion in the Public Square is Dealt Another Blow!”

by Gerri Gibney on 06/20/13

What will it take for half the Americans in this country to wake up?  Religious people and their institutions are being openly attacked by President Barack Hussein Obama and there is no outrage?  I don’t believe it is right to speak of politics from the pulpit, but this is not about politics anymore it is about religious freedom. 


If you haven’t read his comment about Roman Catholic and Protestant schools, here it is:  “If towns remain divided—if Catholics have their schools and buildings and Protestants have theirs, if we can’t see ourselves in one another and fear or resentment are allowed to harden—that too encourages division and discourages cooperation,” Obama said.


I will not make explanations or excuses for parochial schools, their very underpinnings are based on the Gospel.  No one should be looking to rationalize or to try and justify their mission in education.  What should be happening is that people of all faith groups should be chastising and bringing to task this incompetent, non-thinking, divisive president who knows nothing of Christianity and yet purports to be a member of it.


We do not need to defend ourselves as people of faith; instead, President Barack Hussein Obama needs to apologize for his offensive, untrue, hurtful remarks.


He is trying, and doing a very good job of it, to erase religion from the public square and unless all of us as people of faith start to speak up it will happen.  A move has been underway to get rid of the tax exempt status for religious institutions.  It will only be a matter of time before the hue and cry will go out to remove this exemption from religious groups who will not ordain homosexuals and who will not marry them.  And, if a religious group does not ordain woman, they will be under attack as well.


President Barack Hussein Obama surrounds himself with clerics when the need for a photo op arises, especially at national disasters, when he asks us to pray for all people.  Yet, it seems that the very people who he calls on to lead us in prayer, he has no regard for as people of God.  They are simply tools for him in his unending thrust for complete power. 


President Barack Hussein Obama should be left on the national stage with not one member of the clergy to call on God for His help, and His blessings.  Better we quietly and with purpose do so in our churches, synagogues, and homes to call on Him in all things.  Amen.   


Gerri Gibney

June 20, 2013

"Out of the Darkness"

by Gerri Gibney on 05/15/13

“Out of the Darkness”


Don’t know about you, but since the presidential election I have been looking, searching, no – longing, for someone, anyone, who can speak plainly but intelligently about Republican ideas.  A person who can articulate the politics I believe in, and make it understandable.


Recently read a short but really interesting editorial about Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney’s choice for V.P.  During the election campaign we did not hear enough from Mr. Ryan, he was generally consigned to explaining numbers, rather than ideals.  Mr. Ryan’s acceptance speech as Mr. Romney’s V.P. was on the deck of an American air craft carrier.  The one thing I remember most about that speech was something like this, and I paraphrase most generously; …as Americans we know that our rights are not from the government, but from God.  That is how our government was founded; our forefathers knew that man is given his rights and freedom by the Almighty, not by another man.


 All I can say to that is, Amen.  It really struck me that here was a man, Paul Ryan, who understood what makes America the exceptional country we are.


The short editorial spoke of two recent speeches; one at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, and one at Benedictine College in Kansas.  I have not read these two speeches, I will read them.  According to the editorial, Mr. Ryan made his case for the GOP agenda of free markets, limited government, and a public square thick with churches and charities. 


Mr. Ryan contrasted the GOP agenda with the following:  “Barney Frank once said government is the name for the things we do together.  But that’s just one name.  There are lots of them:  the church meeting, the neighborhood watch, the food bank, the small business, the health clinic, the homeless shelter.  We like to call these things ‘mediating institutions.’  But in the end, they’re just people – people working together.”


My only objection to Mr. Ryan’s statement is that government is one of the names we do together.  We don’t do anything in the name of government together, we simply forge a consensus and compromise.  I suppose you could call that togetherness, I don’t.  But, when Mr. Ryan spoke to Benedictine College he said the following:  “Free enterprise doesn’t reward greed,” it rewards value – because competition checks greed.  And there’s no greater opportunity for greed than government cronyism.  Greed knows how to exploit the books of regulations and the whims of bureaucrats.  It knows how to navigate the halls of power.  So if we’re concerned about greed, we shouldn’t give it more opportunities to grow.”  And, again, I say most certainly, Amen.


Paul Ryan is now on my list as someone to be watching as a possible spokesman for me.  There are a few others, unfortunately, the list isn’t very long.


I know there is a patriot among us; one who is not afraid to speak American ideals, who will lead us out of this dark time in our history.  A patriot who knows America was established as a faith-based, God-centered Judeo-Christian nation.


Gerri Gibney

May 15, 2013